Reviews of the Everson Biennial
REVIEWS OF EVERSON BIENNIAL
They are not posted online, but we have copies here in the gallery. Here's a brief overview of the articles from The Post-Standard:
1. Katherine Rushworth reviewed the Everson Biennial by interviewing Jeremy Bailey, who won best in show, on Sunday June 18, 2006.
2. Katherine Rushworth reviewed the Salon de Refuses on Sunday, June 25, 2006 with the title, "Second Chance, Work in 'Salon des Refuses' brings 'Biennial' unevenness to light"
After reviewing the history of the Salon de Refuses, Katherine writes, "Biennial selection poor / I'll say it upfront. I'm not particularly fond of this year's rendition of the 'Everson Biennial.' / Juror Claire Schneider, associate curator of contemporary art at the Albright Knox Art Gallery in Buffalo, should have taken a couple of additional passes through the slides before she made her final decision as to what works made the cut. / As a result, clutter reigns; too many works of art fill the two main galleries. Why choose three to six pieces by an artist when one or two would have done the job just fine and space is definitely a factor? / The show is uneven; shallow, or poorly executed works hang around the corner from solid conceptual and technically sound pieces. The drawing and painting category is expecially weak with several pieces glaringly out of place. / I found some of the work to be derivative rather than insightful, trendy versus enduring. / Good works of art linger with you after you've experienced them like a good meal. I left the Everson Biennial hungry for something substantial. / Finally, the deep, aquamarine blue covering the main wall in the Coyne Gallery detracted from rather than enhanced the works of art. Vivid color photographs and pastel drawings fought for their visual lives agains the over-powering color. / So how did the works in the 'Salon des Refuses' compare to those in the 'Everson Biennial?' There were two or three pieces in the former show that could have held their own amongst those in the latter. / However, there were many more pieces included in the 'Everson Biennial' that would have been more at home beside those in the 'Salon des Refuses.'"
3. On Thursday, July 6, 2006 under the headline "Everson show is not a reflection of region," Victoria Romanoff of Ithaca writes:
"To the Editor: / Kudos to Katherine Rushworth, contributing art editor, for writing it like it is. The Biennial Show is abysmal! The emperor has no clothes on, while strutting around arrogantly on the second floor of the Everson Museum. / No criteria (that's evident) were used to select this exhibition, and the quiet and empty museum should alarm the board of directors. / That is not to say we should all start painting damp dog noses or pansies in bisque baskets. But pseudo-post-Dada art does not represent the varied and interesting work currently being created in the Finger Lakes area."
4. On Thursday, July 7, 2006 under the headline "Different juror may have chosen Victoria's work," Sandra Trop, the director of the Everson Museum of Art writes:
"To the Editor: / I'm sure Victoria from Ithaca didn't mean to disparage all of the artists in the Biennial exhibition at the Everson. Of the 231 artists who entered, Judge Claire Schneider, associate curator of contemporary art at the Albright Knox, selected this exhibit. Every judge selects a different show. / I'm sorry Victoria didn't get selected. A different juror might have chosen her work. The Salon Des refuses exhibits pieces not at the Everson. / No need to criticize the Everson, nor the Biennial. Please come and visit the Everson when it is crowded or when it is quiet. It is worth the trip and it is free."
Additionally, the New Times published an excellent review by Carl Mellor, which can be read here:
5. http://newtimes.rway.com/2006/070506/art.shtml
Comments? I love the debate. This is the most print I've seen about one show in quite awhile.
-Courtney Rile, Delavan Art Gallery